Angier K9 Field Notes
Read the research with its limits
A starting shelf of short primary-source reading notes. Each entry separates the design, reported finding and limits of interpretation.
This is a small editorial selection, not a systematic review or a consensus statement. It does not establish outcomes for Angier K9. Full critical appraisal and Kelton’s editorial review remain pending. Additional perspectives and replications belong in the next reading pass.
Read the context before naming the emotion
Horowitz (2009) · Primary paper: design, findings and interpretation checked
Explore →Reading noteSeparate reported improvement from welfare measures
Cooper et al. (2014) · Primary paper: abstract and methods context checked; detailed critical appraisal pending
Explore →Reading noteWhat a more precise video measure can add
China, Mills and Cooper (2020) · Primary paper: abstract and methods checked; detailed critical appraisal pending
Explore →Reading noteAn association is not a reason to blame the owner
Sundman et al. (2019) · Primary abstract checked; full-text appraisal pending
Explore →Keep different kinds of evidence distinct
A research finding, a trainer’s explanation, an observation in a video and a reader’s interpretation are different records. Link them where useful without treating any one as a substitute for the others.
Keep this page for later
Saved pages stay on this browser and are included in notebook exports. Sign-in and cross-device saving are still in development.